Monday, 31 March 2008

A Day in the Life of a PR


I was recently interviewed for the Finance Talking website, the idea of the site being to find out how people get into different types of comms and find out their tips and advice for others who might be interested in a similar career.

I was told I was chosen because I didn't graduate that long ago and would be a great person to ask about how to get into financial PR (Not sure where they got that idea from...).

The interview isn't up yet, but it will appear on the 'Day in the Life' slot of the Careers Centre page soon. In the meantime, below is the interview - enjoy!


A Day in Life


Ben Matthews, Associate at Waughton


So Ben, you went straight into PR from university

That’s right. I graduated from York – where I studied English Literature – last year.


I’m always curious about how people get into comms. Did you know what you wanted to do when you went to university?

Not really. I’ve always been quite good at writing and got involved in the student newspaper – York Vision – while I was studying. I wrote for my first and second years and then in my third year I became editor.


Who chooses the editor?

Everyone else on the paper. I outlined my plans – a redesign, a different editorial direction – and stood for election.


And you won?

Yes. It was really good fun – and I learnt so much about the media….


So why didn’t you become a journalist!

That’s a fair question – and I nearly did. In fact I applied to City University and got a place on their postgraduate journalism course. But I turned it down.


But isn’t that one of the best courses in the country?

By then I had decided that journalism wasn’t for me.


What made you decide that?

I went and did work experience on a local paper and just didn’t enjoy it. I realised that unless I was absolutely determined and incredibly lucky I wouldn’t get on to ‘Fleet Street’. And I knew a career on local papers wasn’t for me. So I started job-hunting and saw an ad for my current company – Waughton.


Tell me about Waughton?

We’re a financial and corporate communications agency. We’re not a big outfit but we have the knowledge and experience of a large agency with the creativity and resourcefulness of a small one.


Did you know much about PR before you applied?

No. But the ad mentioned lots of skills which I’d picked up with my journalistic work. I realised how much journalism and PR have in common.


Really?

Oh yes. In fact I find that every day I use those skills I gained at the paper. It was the best preparation I could have had for a career in PR.


Give me an example

Well, I used to receive lots of press releases – many of them shockingly badly written. I learnt a lot of dos and don’ts which are invaluable now that I have to write press releases myself.


So you got the job?

Yes. I was hired by Robin Hepburn who runs Waughton.


And you’re learning a lot from him?

Yes, he’s an amazing mentor. He was at Weber Shandwick – one of the biggest agencies in the world - before he set up his own firm five years ago. He’s a very experienced senior corporate communicator.


So when you joined, did you have a long period of hand-holding?

Not at all! It was deep-end stuff. One of the first things I did was accompany Bill when he met a Chinese delegation.


Bill?

Bill Spears. He’s brilliant – his former clients include Cunard, Guinness and Diageo. Soon after I joined he took me out to meet some prospective clients from Japan. I began to learn about pitching for business – a really important skill in agency PR.



Was that scary?

No – it’s what I love about working here. It illustrates the beauty of working for a relatively small agency – I’m learning a wide variety of stuff much quicker than I would in a large firm.


And you’re happy to have landed in an agency rather than in-house?

Definitely. I think it’s much more exciting. Maybe my view will change as I get older, but I love the variety and pace. I read somewhere recently that your time in agency can be measured in “dog years”.


Dog years!

Yes – a year in agency is worth seven years in-house in terms of experience. You learn so much.


So tell me about a typical day

Typically I will work with Robin or Bill to look after a particular client. But the great thing about my job is that every day is different. I could be drafting copy for a corporate brochure one day, then preparing a pitch document the next. Though I will always keep an eye on our client’s media coverage and collate everything, I’ll research them and their business and keep an eye on their competitors. I scan the media quite thoroughly every day.


Is that a chore?

Not at all. It’s a pleasure and I really got into the newspaper habit when I was a student journalist. I’ll read the FT, for example, and see if I can see opportunities to promote our clients in the paper’s special reports supplements. I’ll also cast an eye over the Telegraph, Mail, Times and City AM – all in print and online.


Is City AM any good?

Well it’s a bit like Metro – a good read if you have five minutes. The FT needs more time of course, but it’s so worth it – it’s an incredible business newspaper. And our clients feel that way too.


And what do you do if you see a feature coming up which a client might be interested being mentioned in?

I’ll find out which journalist is writing the story and take a look at their work. The most important thing is to make sure that your client fits – there’s no point in wasting time if they don’t. Then we’ll go back to the client and check they’re interested and then prepare the story we want to tell. And then a call to the journalist concerned.


Isn’t that intimidating?

Not if you’ve done your prep. Journalists really appreciate PRs who have done their homework and who are offering stories which really suit the features they’re writing. It helps them to do a good job. But the bottom line is it must be a good story. It really helps having been a student journalist myself – it gives me confidence.


How else do you raise the profile of your clients?

Another route is to get them reported in the appointment columns of newspaper. Recently, for example, we pitched an interesting appointment story to The Times and they ended up doing a feature on the client company in their business section because we were able to give the journalist a good ‘hook’.


Hook?

Yes, a hook or ‘peg’. That’s just journalese for the news event that makes your story interesting and newsy – it’s the news hook they can ‘hang’ your feature on.


Tell me, do you do much financial PR?

Let me put it this way: as a junior member of the team, I won’t be expected to present a client company’s results to analysts! And lots of our clients aren’t listed anyway. But I have picked up some financial PR skills – Robin’s background is in banking – and I will get training if I need more.


I believe you’re interested in social networking – things like MySpace and FaceBook?

Very much so. It’s going to be huge in PR and crucial for positioning and messaging.


So how long have you been with Waughton?

Six months.


And what would be your dream job?

Too be honest, I don’t really know. Maybe to have my own agency. But then if you were at the top you might have less time with clients. I don’t think I’d like that. Thinking about it, I’d really love to do PR for a big charity.


You’re an ethical PR person then

I certainly try to be. Without sounding pompous, that’s really important to me. I couldn’t work for a client I didn’t believe in.


What sort of person do you think makes a good PR?

In no particular order: you should be sociable and talk and relate to people; you must understand how the media works; you must be able to pick up the phone to a client or journalist; you must have good writing skills and good reading skills.


Reading skills?

Yes. To read the papers, do your research – to scan and absorb information. It’s really important.


And what are your tips for someone thinking of a career in comms?

Do your research – into what PR really is and the agencies or companies you might want to work for – and which sector: corporate, fashion, financial, internal and so on, and think about whether you want to go for agency or go in-house.


And the most important thing?

I think the writing. That’s why I thank my lucky stars that I did all that journalism at university. It’s been just as useful getting where I am as my degree.


www.waughton.com

Thursday, 27 March 2008

PR Event: Social Media - The Assassin or Saviour of Traditional Media?


On a night where only the red wine being served was colder than the weather outside, the CIPR Greater London Group brought together a panel to debate the current role of social media in journalism and PR.

Titled as "Social Media - The Assassin or Saviour of Traditional Media?", the panel consisted of:

- Pete Clifton - BBC's Head of Editorial Development and Multi-Media Journalism

- Shane Richmond - Communities Editor of Telegraph.co.uk.

- Stephen Davies - Webitpr, Social Media and PR blogger at prblogger.com


The Facebook event page, where most people found out about the event, introduced the night as follows:

"The rise of Social Media, whether it be blogging, social networks or YouTube has created a new generation of consumer content creators.

Individuals now have tools to publish and broadcast their views on your organisation, brand or industry and potentially reach an audience of millions with the simple click of a mouse.

As the content creation generation matures, what are the implications for traditional media? Will today’s news organisations whether in print, TV or online survive and more importantly retain their authority and influence? How are media outlets adapting to the rise in ‘citizen journalism’ and reaching out to the public to help create the news?

Above all, what are the implications of Social Media for the symbiotic relationship between the media and PR industry that has endured for so long?"

The event was centred around three questions that were sent into the Facebook event page. Below are the key points that I took away from the event, structured around those questions:

  1. Are the days of traditional journalism numbered?
  • The traditional journalism on offer is changing and will embrace the services that are on offer, e.g. Facebook, Twitter et al
  • There is still alot of value in expert commentary and analysis from traditional journalists and it is a service that journalism will continue to offer
  • Traditional media channels cannot be inward looking - they must link out to other sites, e.g. YouTube, blogs, etc
  • On the other hands, these online services are becoming valuable to traditional media for pictures, videos, case studies, etc
  • Ulitmately, people don't want for tomorrow's paper to arrive, which means that news publications now have rolling deadlines
  • Any embagroes on press releases now become redundant - a 6 hour embargo might as well be 6 months
  • PRs are being pushed into social media rather than embracing it
  • Stephen pointed out that an advertising company has been reaching out to bloggers, even though the online PR community has been claiming this space as their own
  • Emily Bell of The Guardian has said that 50% of the website's traffic comes from articles over a year old
  • This has led to a realisation that what aoppears online will stick around for much longer than in print
2. Does social media have the potential to restore trust in traditional journalism?
  • Stephen thinks it can't, but it should come at the issue of trust from a different angle
  • Social media builds a link between the public to traditional media
  • Social media helps the public to think about journalism's accuracy and reliability
  • Traditional journalism has taken a while to build a relationship with its community, but now has a good relationship with its audience
  • At the core of this relationship is a trust in traditional media that has always strived to be impartial and balanced
  • Before the internet, trust was taken for granted by traditional journalism
  • Blogs have brought the idea of transparency into the media, as editor's now blog about their editorial decisions, whether people agree with them or not
  • Ultimately, good journalists still use good journalism skills, sourcing solid information, checking their facts and finding the newsworthy angle, no matter where they get their information from
  • Blogging is about being transparent - the ones that are highly influential and widely read are the ones that are most open and transparent
3. Is the press release dead? Should it be used when contacting bloggers?
  • The press release is generally dying a bit
  • The principles of PR are the same, there are just different ways of doing it now
  • When approaching bloggers, PRs must individualise their approach and think "What can I give them that will create value for them?"
  • We need to be more flexible with the term 'citizen journalist' - obviously you wouldn't go to a citizen dentist
  • Indeed, someone in the top 100 most influential bloggers is to all intents and purposes a journalist

Post event, it was good to finally meet Stephen (@stedavies) in person and had a good chat with Amanda Rose (@amandita). There were also a curiosu assortment of canapes doing the rounds, a sort of petit anglaise chique cuisine, including mini-hamburgers, mini-fish & chips, and mini-bangers and mash (obviously Stephen's favourite by the way he slurped them down on one!).

On another note, the Property PR sector must be booming as the room seemed to be packed with Property PR people and in-house PRs at estate agents - luckily the debate still managed to steer clear of falling house prices.

Also, and alot of the other people at the event told said the same thing to me, the CIPR needs to sort out the way people pay for these events. £20 is a bit steap and why am I sending someone a cheque when some kind of online booking system could be setup? how about using eventbrite.com, as suggested by Amanda?

Overall, this was a very good event with interesting and insightful speakers. Apparently, this is the third year in the row that an event on this subject had taken place - I'm looking forward to next year's already!

Windows Live enters online storage arena with SkyDrive

An invitation to sign up to SkyDrive was sitting in my inbox this
morning, the details of which are below.

But my first thoughts were, why is there a 5gb limit when there
are many other services out there offering unlimited space?


Windows Live SkyDrive
FREE 5GB Online Storage - Click Here to Start!



Forget the Memory

stick -Windows Live™ SkyDrive is here!

Windows Live SkyDrive is a brand

new password-protected way to easily

store files and photos online and then

access them from virtually any PC

connected to the Internet!

Free up your pockets, put your

memory stick online! No more e-mailing

files back and forth to yourself!

No more leaving your USB at work or

at home by mistake! You can now have

access to all your files – online

wherever you are.










Wednesday, 26 March 2008

The CIPR drafts its London Manifesto


The CIPR has just issued its draft London Manifesto, which is what they hope they’ll be saying on the 24th June 2008 following the World Public Relations Conference and Festival.


Elisabeth Lewis-Jones, President of the Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR) and Director of Liquid Public Relations, invites readers of PR Voice to let her know what they think and join in the debate. There have been no comments left so far, so hopefully she'll get more feedback before submitting the final manifesto.

The draft manifesto is as follows:


'Our conference has illustrated that public relations, where practiced professionally, is a force for good.

At its best public relations, unlike other forms of marketing communications, is interactive: by facilitating communication between organisations, in whatever sector, and their customers and clients, the practice of public relations creates bonds between peoples.

Public relations practitioners respect diversity and help minorities access public and other services.

Public relations and public affairs practitioners encourage understanding and access to government and can give a voice to those who would otherwise not be heard.

Our vision of public relations can function fully only in democratic societies that respect human rights. It is thus a key role of all who work in public relations to respect and to promote structures of government that are truly democratic.

Public relations skills must not therefore be the preserve of big organisations: those techniques and skills can be understood and available to all. They do, of course, need to be progressively honed and include the handling of social media, which are in themselves more interactive.

All these claims have been illustrated during the conference; by case studies that have focused on our role in promoting and giving confidence to countries, regions and cities; in celebrating diversity and social inclusion; and in helping companies and organisations in 'difficult' sectors to communicate their case to the public and to interact with them.

With this focus on acting ethically and professionally practitioners across all areas, whether in consultancy, in-house or independent, have drawn from this conference a greater understanding of the unique roles our profession can play at the business, social and economic level both nationally and internationally.

The values underlying our claims are also inherent in the work done by the public relations associations represented at the conference in our Global Alliance. The lessons of this conference are thus particularly relevant to those who are members of such associations and who are committed to the highest standards.

Let our messages, however, also go to those who are not members of associations working under ethical codes and apparently not so committed to professional standards: so that they can be urged to accept their responsibilities and join in the tasks that we as delegates have accepted.'

The manifesto reads very well, even though it could be considered strange looking back at the results of a conference that hasn't taken place yet.

I take issue with the second paragraph in dismissing the interactivity of other marketing communications, especially in the age of the internet and mobile technology - and I'm sure those from other marketing communications have many more arguments than me against this point.

The manifesto is right to point out the CIPR's aim to 'encourage understanding and access to government.' As a trade organisation, this is a vital remit of the CIPR and presumably why many of its members, especially those from Government facing PR companies, have joined.

The paragraph on the ability of PR to function fully in democratic societies scares me a bit with its echo of American democratic zeal, but I think the point is essentially right, especially the part about human rights. But for a London Manifesto, and the last time I checked London was in a truly democratic society, is this point - at this elevated level - necessary? Perhaps it should manifesto should be titled 'World Public Relations Festival Manifesto'?

I'm obviously not the foremost thinker on issues such as these and I generally like this draft of the manifesto, but what do you guys out there in PR Land think?


Let me know in the comments section!

(Actually, maybe some people should leave comments on the PR Voice blog post, otherwise it might get a bit embarrassing...)

Tuesday, 25 March 2008

A lesson learned from two mythical Chinese fishermen...

Today, Boing Boing pointed towards a Netsuke and Inro Flickr pool:

"Netsuke are tiny Japanese sculptures, first appearing in the 17th century, that were attached to traditional robes. They acted as fasteners for Inro, cases that held small objects because the clothing had no pockets."

The British Museum has a collection of over 3300 netsuke, which I've been lucky enough to see. I managed to find my favourite on their website: the 'Ashinage and Tenaga' wooden netsuke from the Japanese Edo Period:



"Two mythical Chinese fishermen, Ashinaga ('Long Legs') and Tenaga ('Long Arms') lived on the sea shore somewhere in northern China. Here they combine forces to catch an octopus. Ashinaga wades through the water with his long legs, while Tenaga stretches for the octopus with his long arms."

The reason it's my favourite?

It has to be because it's a prime example of two people with different abilities (or disabilities) working together towards a common goal.

Cheesy, I know, but the netsuke wood carving is still a simple visualisation of an important lesson for all of us.

Exxon Mobil's strange PR strategy


Reported in City AM today:

"Frustrated oil journalists tell me that Exxon Mobil, the world’s largest publicly traded oil and gas company, has come up with a rather unusual strategy for dealing with tricky media enquiries — simply not answering the phone. An unanswered call placed yesterday did nothing to quell the rumours. Exxon, take note: it takes more than ignoring phone calls to deter us pushy media types."

I wonder if this unfortunate example of poor media relations practice will actually lead to Exxon Mobil's PR team getting lots of practice in crisis communications?

Thursday, 20 March 2008

PR should keep moving confidently forward


"Job losses on horizon for agencies as markets slide"

That was the gloomy headline on the front cover of today's PR Week, but upon reading the article it comes across as obvious hyperbole.

The first paragraph of the article instantly takes the legs away from the story:

"Job losses are inevitable at PR agencies that focus heavily on IPO and M&A activity if markets continue to stall, according to senior consultants and analysts."

A pretty obvious statement. True, some of the biggest profits for Financial and Corporate PR agencies comes from IPO and M&A activity, but any agency with half a brain will have changed their focus - or at least evened out their practices to other areas of Financial PR - as the credit crunch kicked in.

It's a different matter for in-house professionals though. With plans for major job cuts at Northern Rock and other financial insitutions, it's inevitable that in-house PROs will be laid off. And as one senior PRO said, "Recruitment already appears to be freezing, especially in-house."

But with Lords Bell and Chadlington, who previously said that there was no sign of a downturn in PR, remain steadfastly upbeat. They've been through a recession or two in their time, so surely they know best?

As a result, it's anybody's guess whether the PR industry will join the recession or continue to grow.

This enigma is backed up by the Danny Rogers' leader, which leads with the headline "See the silver lining to some dark skies." Rogers argues that the comms industry is now so broadly based that when certain areas of business suffer, other opportunities present themselves:

"Instead the biggest danger for the industry is a more intangible fear and indecisiveness."

The horizon may look gloomy today and PROs may be denying reality, but Rogers believes that the message must be the same:

"Keep moving confidently forward."

And if anybody can put an optimistic spin on an impeding recession, who better than the PR industry?

Wednesday, 19 March 2008

Working with Workology

I've just been playing around with Workology, which comes across a mix of a social network and an online collaborative workspace. As a member of Generation Y, it appeals to me as it points towards the new ways of working that young professionals will experience in the future.

Workology describes itself as "a selected circle of proactive individuals, organisations and businesses who believe there’s a better way to work than the traditional ‘nine to five’. Workology brings everyone together to create work opportunities that suit your workstyle and are otherwise tricky to find."

The site 'works' in a number of ways:

  • You can showcase your expertise by setting up your own mini site, which comes with its own URL and free, unlimited storage space. Importantly, the content can be searched for independently on the net and is not behind a gate.
  • You can work with other members in collaborative workspaces to create work opportunities or solutions to suit your individual needs, in both public areas or in private groups.
  • You can connect with other like-minded members to get advice and support and find opportunities - a good way to boost your professional credibility in a similar vein to professional blogs, Linked In, etc.

Entry to the Beta programme is available via request from the Workology homepage to request entry to the exclusive beta programme. You also get 25 invites once you’re a member so you can get your current community involved staright away.

There is also a Workology blog with technical updates, service announcements and opportunities to talk to the team behind the site.

It's an interesting concept, which I'm sure will mean that many other sites with a similar aim will spring up soon. There's not enough users on there yet (less than 100) so it's too early to gauge its usefulness, but it is certainly one to watch over the coming weeks.

Tuesday, 18 March 2008

Employee blogs the hammer falling on Bear Stearns


Following on from yesterday's post on the demise of Bear Stearns, PR News Online has provided a brief glimpse into what really happened inside Bear Stearns' New York City office this past weekend. An employee offers this insider's take on what was going of behind the scenes among the employees "when the hammer fell", in a similar vein to when employees of Yahoo! blogged about being fired:

"The morale and the attitude of Bear Stearns' workforce has always been a positive and familial atmosphere. The workers in general have always felt that there was a certain amount of stability within the conservative company which is often highly unusual in the competitive and volatile investment banking world of high finance. Last year, Bear Stearns experienced a financial loss for the first time, and it trimmed some of its workforce. Those who survived the cuts unknowingly experienced a false sense of security thinking the worst was over.

So, needless to say, when the hammer fell down hard this Friday it left many workers dazed, confused and wondering what happened. Saturday and Sunday, Bear Stearns was filled with numerous high-ranking officers and accountants and various heads of departments, all working diligently. The lobby and elevator banks have never been so busy on a weekend. When the news was announced that Bear Stearns was being bought out, there was an immediate shift in morale. Many people were seen leaving the lobby with boxes filled with personal items. Many workers, mostly support staff, were left wondering if their job would be there come Monday morning.

People tried to ease the tension with jokes, but one could sense the shock and disappointment that radiated throughout the halls. The biggest concern among the general workforce, mainly support staff, was—if they were to lose their jobs—would they be able to find another one when the economy is waning and most companies are in a hiring freeze? Often times when people read stories about layoffs and cutbacks, we see the numbers and forget that those numbers are people—and not those people at the top of organizations, but the single mothers and those individuals who live paycheck to paycheck.

The greatest tragedy in all this is not the collapse of a strong and established company, but the hundreds, if not thousands, of workers who stand a good chance in losing their livelihood when the merger is complete and the re-structuring begins. For most employees at Bear Stearns, all they can do now is "wait and see" and hope for the best."


Monday, 17 March 2008

Little PR could do to save Bear Stearns, but lessons to be learned for other bank bosses

Pictured: Alan Schwartz, president and CEO of Bear Stearns. (Daniel Acker/Bloomberg News /Landov)


In a post titled 'The Cost of Incredulity', Jim Horton examines the Bear Stearns' acquisition by JP Morgan for just $236 million and asks what PR could have done to save the bank:

"Little, it turns out. The bank tried to calm investors, but fear and greed ruled. The bank did not have enough friends to stand by it in the end...

Mark this event in your memory. Use it whenever corporate executives question the value of what public relations should be doing."

This analysis comes off the back of an interesting article by Robert Peston, arguing that banks may be too private and that as the power of global companies is perceived to be increasing, it is arguable that those who run them have a greater responsibility to explain themselves in public forums:

"Even if a chief executive insists on sticking to the traditional view that it’s only shareholders that really have the right to put him or her on the spot, those shareholders are the many millions of us via our pension funds."

Applied to the weekend's events, Bear Stearns' employees are losing hundreds of millions of value in their shares, their jobs, their culture and their future and it is the bosses like Alan Schwartz who have to explain why it's happened.

Peston went on to ask a couple of bank bosses why they and their teams were being so shy:

"The reason they gave was that conditions in money markets remain exceptionally difficult, the confidence of bankers remains fragile, and the outlook for their businesses is hugely uncertain. And in those circumstances they and their executives have to weigh their every word with care.
Given that they can’t yet predict all the consequences of the unwinding of years of excessive lending, they are fearful of talking to millions of people through a medium they can’t control."

Some important lessons will be learned from those seeking to avoid the dramatic plunge that Bear Stearns has taken: trust, transparency, and strong communication with stakeholders - big and small - are vital in this time of economic upheaval. As Jim Horton says:

"In banking, trust is everything and loss of it, ruinous."

Update - Some text that appears on the Bear Stearns careers' website probably needs taking down:

"Welcome to Bear Stearns. If you're really good at what you do, you probably have a lot of choices when it comes to taking the next step in (or starting) your career. But if you can tackle complex challenges with creative solutions, and want to be able to make your mark quickly regardless of title or tenure, we think your only real choice is pretty clear."

Friday, 14 March 2008

The Battle of the Budget 2008

With the budget out of the way for another year, we can finally get back to worrying about house prices.

But it's also a good time to look back at how the various media covered the budget, which may or may not show how seriously they are taking their online journalism.

I've been taking a look at the Budget-dedicated websites of the main three business newspapers in the UK: The FT, The Telegraph, and The Times.

We all know who won with the Budget - 90-year-old clean-living, self-sufficient hermits - but who will prove victorious in getting reader's eyeballs glued to Darling's eyebrows? (Figuratively speaking...)

The FT


The FT minisite was easy to find, as it was advertised on the main page as well as having a clear URL.

The FT went all out this year, creating podcasts, videos, polls, a print-out-and-keep Budget paper, a 'win or lose?' calculator, not to mention a whole raft of comment and analysis - including user comments as well.

Their video section is particularly worth checking out. Not only did they have a lot of comment and analysis as the Budget was announced, but they were the only site to have videos previewing the budget.

I haven't heard it yet, but you can listen to the 2008 Budget podcast here.

This all might be expected from the FT - after all, the Budget is one of the only times that they would be able to show off their social media prowess. The only down side was the lack of user comments left on the site- just 18 at the last count.

The FT is also awarded a bonus mark as they used a traditional journalism tactic in handing out special Budget reports that evening, ready for City commuters to read. And I like having stuff to read on the way home.

Overall score: 8/10


The Telegraph

Apart from the horrible URL and the unclear menu listing of the expert comments, the Telegraph did a good job.

They took more of a fun angle - well, as 'fun' as the budget can get anyway. A nice video sits up front, but the rest of the video coverage wasn't as good as the FT's. The key points toolbar on the right hand side was a nice touch, as well as the cartoons - though there were only two and these didn't look through to more. The webchat was a useful tool, acting as a Q&A session with expert advice from Grant Thornton.

The highlight of The Telegraph's minisite for me was the interactive graphic, complete with a wobbly-headed Darlingand a clip- art filled 'Winners and Losers' tool.

Lots of viewer input too, with one area of the site containing way more user comments than on the FT's or The Times' coverage.

Livening up the Budget by trying to mix fun elements with expert analysis, but it wouldn't have been worth it if it wasn't backed up by smart graphics, an ease of use, and a wide range of content that users could interact with.

Overall score: 9/10


The Times

The Budget was nicely advertised on the home page of Times Online and also benefited from the bright blue button that sits on the main menu whenever a special subject is around.

The Times has plenty of comment and analysis on offer, bout to be honest, it all looks and feels a bit boring - especially compared to The Telegraph and even the FT.

Having said that, they do have a wealth of content - a well-hidden podcast, a Budget calculator, tax tables, and a photo slideshow. The Times also uses a reader's vote and offers a Q&A facility, although these are located after a long scroll down to the bottom of the page.

However, there seems to be no videos offering comment and analysis, although I did stop by in the morning and found a live video stream (I'm assuming it was live because when I visited the site in the morning it wasn't live, just running an advert for the company that were due to live stream the event...).

Good, but bit of a disappointment given the quality of the rest of their site.

Overall score: 7/10


So The Telegraph wins it, but only marginally against The FT. A great user experience coupled with great comment and analysis, with a dash of interactive fun for good measure.

How did the rest of you found the Budget 2008 experience? All comments would be most welcome.

Now, I'm off to stock up on booze before the tax hikes kick in...

No sign of a downturn in PR


PR Week reports today that Chime Communications, Huntsworth and Havas have all reported an outstanding 2007 in their annual figures, with no downturn apparent so far in 2008.

But despite the positive outlook of many of the large groups, some industry watchers believe a sharp downturn is imminent.

"The PR industry is sticking its head in the sand if it thinks the outlook for the UK economy is optimistic," said Chatsworth Communications founder Nick Murray-Leslie.

This goes against the figures that PR Week reports, the most interesting view being that the number of groups predicting a PR downturn in 2008 is zero.

Lord Bell, Chairman of Chime Communications, gave his view:

"We are in an odd situation right now. Everything seems to be fine, even though we are being told it is not. The level of business at the start of this year indicated no sign of downturn - maybe it just hasn't arrived yet.

It is important to remember that this is not a normal economic cycle; something structural has gone wrong to cause the sub-prime crisis, but this does not necessarily mean business is slowing down.

There is a lack of confidence in the marketplace. Share prices are low, meaning acquisitions are unlikely. There's a kind of constipation in our sector in that respect. But anyone who reads share prices as an indication of how well business is doing is a fool. They are a reflection of market sentiment rather than figures. The market has the jitters but PR is actually performing very well.

Obviously, costs need to be controlled at this time in case there is a downturn, because it is perfectly possible that there will be. But, at the moment, it just seems as though only America has pneumonia."

Many people believe that PR is unaffected by the global credit crunch because when the "market has the jitters", as Lord Bell puts it, companies call on PR for crisis communications and to retain their brand's reputation.

Yet although Lord Bell points out that only America has pneumonia, it may be only a matter of time before it spreads across the Atlantic and affects the UK's PR industry.

PR in the UK Boardroom


Huntsworth recently commissioned Ipsos-Mori to conduct a survey on the state of PR in the UK boardroom. More specifically, they were interested in finding out how much more PR is being used than 3 years ago.


The results were published towards the end of February and here is a summary of the findings:


  • Nearly one-third of organisations will increase their PR expenditure this year –of which just under half will increase expenditure between 3-10%
  • Two-fifths of organisations spent up to £100K on PR last year and 6% spent more than £½ million
  • Just under half spent up to £100K on digital communications last year and 4% spent more than £½ million
  • Approximately half of organisations have a separate budget for digital communications –of which just over two-fifths expect this budget to rise
  • Roughly two-thirds will increase their digital communications spend by more than 20%
  • Approximately half of the respondents believe PR to be a more effective tool than it was a 3 years ago

And here are selected comments from senior executives stating PR is a more effective tool that it was 3 years ago:


  • “I feel that PR is more effective as it is more closely integrated with the marketing industry. PR has been more effective now that there has been a reduction in spending on advertising”
  • “We've become more PR savvy. Experience has shown us that you can really support the brand with PR”
  • “We measure our performance against strict criteria so all our PR has been linked closely to our business objectives. There are always improvements with PR especially in building a relationship and understanding with external stakeholders”
  • “Due to fragmentation of target audience. People now get information from many sources. There is a rise in internet sources. Press and radio are not as effective as they used to be. Also PR is used as a cost effective tool. People are bombarded with advertising and they pay more attention to editorial”
  • “As the mobile communication world becomes more saturated, the products become more complicated. It's a key factor being able to communicate”.
  • “PR is an effective tool as it gives us access to channels we would not otherwise have. We have only started using it within the last 3 years”
  • “To reach end users that you normally wouldn't be able to reach. Due to the level of web connectivity and communication this is easier. People will read a good quality website and they are attracted to good quality websites, therefore increasing the improvement”
  • “It helps us get out more detailed messages that would be difficult to do in advertising”
  • “It provides us with the means of reaching our audience and communicating our aims and values”

Around one-third of organisations will increase their PR expenditure this year? Far from being in a recession, then, the industry appears to be growing if this survey is to be believed.


I think that just from these quotes we can see how senior executives are aware of PR aware, and some even showed a deeper understanding of its usefulness and effectiveness, especially in terms of relationships and interconnectivity.


Although there is still a paradox on the cost front – why does PR cost less than advertising but as more effective in building a brand?


The report can be downloaded from here.

Thursday, 13 March 2008

Links of the Day - 13/03/08

I'm not normally into posting these kind of lists - I prefer to post about a certain subject at length - but there were just too many diamonds in the rough this morning, so I felt I should break the tradition and spread the link love.
Some are PR related, others are just for fun. If you find any of the links useful and want me to post more link lists in the future, let me know by leaving a comment at the bottom of the post!

  • The Future of Voice my be Voiceless - A neckband that translates thought into speech by picking up nerve signals; with careful training a person can send nerve signals to their vocal cords without making a sound. Voice without voice? Truly amazing...
  • Tweetpeek - Another "Tweet Treat" that lets users create a group Twitter feed for companies, industries and communities.
  • Games can Fix the World - Jane McGonigal gives me a reason not to grow up and keep playing on my Playstation - amplified happiness!

That's all for today - enjoy the list and don't forget to comment!

Tuesday, 11 March 2008

Harness the energy of your team


A lesson in in-house PR from Julie Meyer, who wrote a column in today's City AM arguing that you need a company where staff police themselves.

She starts the column with an anecdote about an incident that happened in early 2000:

"My American colleague was used to small talk with people he randomly met, and so said to the receptionist as I rolled my eyes, “So do you like working here?” with a big smile expecting some lukewarm “yes it’s a nice place” in response. Staring straight ahead, she let rip: “No, actually this place is filled with nasty people who are very unpleasant to work with, and I want to leave as soon as I find another job.”

Evangelists for your company starts from the very top but applies to everyone, even the receptionist at the bottom. If you're cleaner is treated badly, they'll speak about your company in the same way as the receptionist did, which is more than likely bad for business as Meyer explains:

"Business is spirit — it is all energy. All bad companies show their spots regardless of how much makeup the company’s directors try to put over them."

Having created the picture of a 'bad company' (I feel that she could have come up with another example rather than just using a personal anecdote and not naming the company in question) the 'great company' she uses as an example is Apple, who I recently blogged about on a similar topic:

"All great companies have a mission — without exception. Apple, the maker of the iPod, lost its way, but never lost its followers: there have always been hardcore Apple addicts. Apple’s reinvention has been a wonder of the 21st century but the mission was always there — to bring insanely great products to market. The keeper of the mission, Steve Jobs, returned and brought the energy back."

If PR practitioners want to take one point from Meyer's article on the importance of having company evangelists as vital to in-house PR, it is this:

If you want to harness the energy of your team, throw away the company handbook along with anyone who has negative energy. Agree a set of principles that you believe in, and secure the commitment of your team to those principles.

It’s a scary process but anything short of this means you spend you life policing your staff. You can only get lift-off if you have a self- and team-policing environment where people care enough about the firm to nudge and accelerate people themselves towards the common goal and common good."

Meyer goes on to argue the case for "covenants not contracts", which I feel weakens her argument slightly, so the last quote here is a useful place for this post to stop.

If you want to read the whole article, you can find it here.

PR Event: Social Media - The Death of Print?


"Social media won't kill traditional media, but it's definitely strangling it" - Drew Benvie.

Taylor Bennett and Unicorn Jobs invited a group of us along to an event which discussed social media and how it relates to the mainstream media, called 'Social Media - The Death of Print?'.

The erratic and rather weather conditions obviously took a few casualties as the event wasn't as busy as the Facebook event page suggested, but it was a good event with a panel and audience that spoke with enthusiasm around the issues of social media and PR.

On the panel were:


It was good to meet some of my online contacts in the real world, including Steve Waddington, Ged Carroll, Drew Benvie, Jaz Cummins, Sarah Stimson, and Alex Pearmain and Alain Desmier of the PR and Comms Network. I missed Justin Hayward, but I'm sure that there'll be more opportunities to meet.

Ged Carroll, who obviously kept much better notes than me, has a run down of the event which you can read on his blog, and Sarah Stimson also mentions the event over at her blog. Below are some of the key points that I took away from the event:


  • When pitching to bloggers, know who they are and talk to them as though they were someone you knew. If you read their blog for long enough, you’ll know what they want.
  • Since he started blogging, Mick has never read so many newspapers in hard print.
  • Disaggregation is the key term. It involves the displacement of the editorial process: social media is turning disruption, the editorial process where traditional media filters news into one channel, into engagement.
  • In the next 10 years, newspapers will find a way to grab value (revenue) from the niche markets in social media.
  • “Lies get half way around the world before the truth has a chance to get its boots on” – Tony Benn. Blogging is a chance for the truth to get its boots on and knock lies on the head before they get anywhere.
  • The real value in public relations is in audience insight: social networks are an ideal tool to gain this insight.
  • Bloggers are their own brand. Corporate brands are slowing, personal brands are growing.
  • Find the yellow canary – the blogger who’ll warn you when something big is going to happen.
  • Markets are conversations.


Looking back, these points perhaps aren't as poignant when placed out of context, so I recommend also reading Ged's post. But the debate was very useful to those who attended and I look forward to attending similar events.